Sources

Every number, and where it came from.

This is the working file behind the arguments on this site. For each figure you get the exact group that was measured, the organization that produced it, when it was collected, and a link. Where a number has a weakness, it is written next to the number rather than left for you to find.

How to read this

Not all research is the same weight, so the figures below are grouped by how they were produced rather than by topic. A federal survey that randomly selects households and publishes its margin of error is stronger evidence than a company survey of people who volunteered to answer. Both can appear in an argument. They should not be quoted as if they were equal.

Survey sentiment, meaning what people say about their degree, is kept separate from records-based measures like underemployment, wages and debt. Both matter. They are not the same kind of evidence.

That is also why this page is not ordered to match the problem page. Reading it in story order would tell you where a figure was used; reading it in this order tells you how far each one can be pushed, which is the more useful thing to know when you are checking somebody’s argument. Entries that appear on the problem page carry a small tag showing where, so you can still find any specific claim.

Federal and probability-sample research

Random or address-based recruitment, published methodology, stated margin of error. The strongest evidence on this page.

58%

Act 3 · Part 03

of young adults said they lacked “meaning or purpose” in their lives in the previous month. On what was harming their mental health: 56% named financial worries, 51% achievement pressure, 50% not knowing what to do with their life, 45% a sense that things are falling apart and 44% a sense of not mattering to others. 36% screened positive for anxiety and 29% for depression, against 18% and 15% of teens.

Who was measuredNationally representative NORC AmeriSpeak panel, fielded December 2022: 709 young adults aged 18–25, 396 teens, 748 parents. Anxiety and depression screened with GAD-2 and PHQ-2.

SourceMaking Caring Common, Harvard Graduate School of Education, On Edge · October 24, 2023

Read it carefullyThese are self-reported drivers: young adults naming what they believe is weighing on them, not a measured causal chain. GAD-2 and PHQ-2 are brief screeners, not diagnoses. The survey was fielded in December 2022, so pandemic effects are not separable. And nothing in it attributes any of this to college or to the path; the problem page sets the figures beside the path’s steps and lets the reader draw the line. The report is also deliberately hopeful about this cohort, describing them as possibly “more emotionally aware and open about mental health challenges than any generation in our history.”

“”

Act 3 · Part 03

“Far too many young adults told us that they feel on edge, lonely, directionless, and that they worry about financial security. Many are ‘achieving to achieve’ and find little meaning in either school or work.”

Who said itRichard Weissbourd, faculty director of Making Caring Common and senior lecturer at the Harvard Graduate School of Education; lead author of the report.

SourceHarvard Graduate School of Education · October 24, 2023

Read it carefullyA characterization by the study’s lead author, not a finding. It is quoted because “achieving to achieve” names the mechanism the problem page has been describing for two acts, in the words of the person who ran the survey.

62nd

Act 3 · Part 03

the United States’ world ranking for the life evaluations of people under 30, against 10th for those aged 60 and over. The U.S. placed 23rd overall, down from 15th the year before. In the authors’ words: “the young are now, in 2021–2023, the least happy age group. This is a big change from 2006–2010, when the young were happier than those in the midlife groups.”

Who was measuredGallup World Poll life evaluations, 2021–2023, ranked across 143 countries.

SourceHelliwell, Huang, Shiplett & Wang, World Happiness Report 2024, ch. 2 · 2024

Read it carefullyThree limits worth knowing. 62nd and 10th are table cells, not sentences: the chapter never writes them out in prose; what it does write is that in the U.S. and Canada the rankings for the over-60s are “50 or more places higher than for those under 30.” The quoted reversal covers a four-country group (U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand), and the associated three-quarters-of-a-point fall is that group’s average, not a U.S.-only figure. And the authors caution that mid-table ranks are unstable, with 95% confidence regions exceeding 25 places for some countries. Note also that this is not a Western Europe finding: the chapter describes Western Europe as “almost completely flat” across age groups.

“”

Act 3 · Part 03

“Across every dimension of well-being that we looked at; happiness, health, meaning, character, relationships, financial stability, each one was strictly increasing with age. Those who are 18 to 25 felt they were worse off across all these dimensions. It was pretty striking, pretty disturbing.

Who said itTyler VanderWeele, Professor of Epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and senior author of the study, published in JAMA Psychiatry. Survey fielded January 2022.

SourceAlvin Powell, “Why are young people so miserable?”, Harvard Gazette · September 15, 2022

Read it carefullyThe survey was fielded in January 2022, mid-Omicron, and VanderWeele repeatedly names the pandemic as a factor; particularly for the social-connection and physical-health measures. He also says plainly that the data “is purely descriptive. It doesn’t allow us to get at causes.” Two things keep it usable: he describes the crisis as one that “predates and was worsened by the pandemic,” and he notes the pattern was already appearing in January 2020, before it. Asked about causes he reaches unprompted for job prospects and education debt, but that is his speculation, not a finding.

44

Act 3 · Part 03

countries in which the long-standing U-shape of wellbeing across age has disappeared. Ill-being no longer peaks in midlife; it now falls steadily with age, because the young have got so much worse since roughly 2013.

Who was measuredGlobal Minds data pooled across 44 countries including the U.S. and U.K., 2020–2025.

SourceBlanchflower et al., “The declining mental health of the young and the global disappearance of the unhappiness hump shape in age”, PLOS One · 2025

Read it carefullyCited here for one reason: it is the third independent research program to find the same reversal, on different data and a different method from the Harvard study and the World Happiness Report. Blanchflower’s own leading explanation is smartphones and social media, not education or the labour market. Nothing here supports the claim that the path caused this, and the problem page does not make that claim.

Act 2 · Part 03

the rise in the price of college tuition and fees between 1985 and 2025, against roughly for consumer prices generally. CPI for college tuition and fees went from 119.9 to 955.3; all-items CPI went from 107.6 to 321.9. Both series share the 1982–84 = 100 base.

Who was measuredU.S. city average, all urban consumers, not seasonally adjusted. Annual averages. Tuition and fees only; this is a sticker series and does not net out grant aid.

SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index · series through 2025

Read it carefullyThe gap opened over roughly thirty-five years and has since closed. Between 2020 and 2025 tuition rose about 9% while all prices rose about 24%, so tuition has recently risen more slowly than inflation; the chart on the problem page shows that flattening and the caption states it. Two further limits: CPI tracks published price, not what families actually pay, and College Board figures show average net price after aid falling in real terms in recent years. And a price index cannot say anything about whether the thing is worth buying. The problem page uses this only for the shape of the price line, never as evidence of value.

30%

Act 2 · Part 02

of U.S. teens say anxiety and depression are a major problem among people their age at their school. It tops the list, ahead of bullying (22%), drug use (19%), physical fights (17%) and drinking (14%).

Who was measuredU.S. teens ages 13 to 17. The same Pew survey as the 68% grades-pressure figure, so the two can be cited together without mixing populations.

SourcePew Research Center, “The Gender Gap in Teen Experiences” · March 13, 2025

Read it carefullyThis is what teens observe about their peers, not a self-report and not a clinical diagnosis, so it measures how visible the problem is rather than how prevalent. Girls 35%, boys 24%. It carries no claim about cause; nothing in the survey attributes it to academic pressure, and the problem page sets the two figures beside each other without asserting that one produces the other.

“”

Act 2 · Part 02

“When parents ask me where all of this pressure is coming from, I ask them: Where is it not?”

Who said itSuniya Luthar, professor of psychology, Arizona State University. Her research first identified students in high-achieving schools as a group at elevated risk.

SourceThe Washington Post, via the Association for Psychological Science · September 26, 2019

Read it carefullyThe oldest source on this page at seven years, and the only reason it is here is that a characterization by the field’s leading researcher does not date the way a measurement does. It is an expert’s framing, not a finding. In the same article Luthar names the sources of the pressure as parents, coaches and administrators together, which is why the problem page does not lay it at the parent’s door.

38.3%

Act 1 · Part 01

of U.S. adults age 25 and over held a bachelor’s degree or higher in 2023, against 25.6% in 2000, 23.0% in 1995, 11.0% in 1970, 7.7% in 1960 and 4.6% in 1940.

Who was measuredAll U.S. residents age 25 and over. Current Population Survey from 1990 onward; decennial census for the earlier years.

SourceNational Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics Table 104.10 · Digest 2023 edition

Read it carefullyThis is the series behind the attainment chart on the problem page. Points before 1990 come from the decennial census rather than the CPS, so the early and late halves of the line are not strictly the same instrument. More important: a degree becoming more common is not the same as a degree becoming less valuable, and this table cannot show the second thing. It is cited on the problem page only for the claim about distinction: that a credential 38% of adults hold cannot by itself separate one applicant from another. The wage-premium evidence is a separate question and cuts partly the other way.

42%

of recent college graduates are underemployed, working a job that does not typically require a degree.

Who was measuredAges 22 to 27 holding a bachelor’s degree or higher. Jobs classified using the Department of Labor O*NET questionnaire.

SourceFederal Reserve Bank of New York · 2026:Q2, released August 2026

Read it carefullyUpdated quarterly (Feb/May/Aug/Nov). The series has ranged 38% to 48% since 2008, so this is elevated, not a record.

5.6%

unemployment among recent college graduates, against about 4.2% for adults overall.

Who was measuredAges 22 to 27 holding a bachelor’s degree or higher. National. The series runs from 1990.

SourceFederal Reserve Bank of New York · 2026:Q2, released August 2026

Read it carefullyRecent graduates still do better than young workers without a degree, who are at 7.8%; the degree has not stopped helping, it has stopped setting anyone apart. It is widely reported that graduates out-unemploying the overall workforce is a first in this series, but that claim is not stated in the Fed’s own text and is not made here.

5.7%

recent-graduate unemployment, against 4.2% for all workers and 7.2% for same-age workers without a degree.

Who was measuredAges 22 to 27 with a bachelor’s or higher; all workers 16+; same-age workers without a degree.

SourceFederal Reserve Bank of New York · March 2026

Read it carefullyThe NY Fed’s Jaison Abel calls the graduates-versus-all-workers comparison “apples and oranges.” Graduates still beat their same-age peers without degrees.

70%

of Americans say the U.S. higher education system is going in the wrong direction, up from 56% in 2020.

Who was measuredAll U.S. adults, n=3,445.

SourcePew Research Center · Published Oct 15, 2025; fielded Sept 22 to 28, 2025

Read it carefullyAmerican Trends Panel Wave 180, probability-based, margin of error ±1.9. The 2020 comparison is the same question on the same panel.

22%

say a four-year degree is worth it even if someone has to take out loans. 47% say worth it only without loans; 29% say not worth it.

Who was measuredAll U.S. adults, n=5,203.

SourcePew Research Center · Published May 23, 2024; fielded Nov 27 to Dec 3, 2023

Read it carefullySame survey: 25% call a degree extremely or very important for getting a well-paying job. Note the field dates. This is 2023 data.

68%

Act 2 · Part 02

of teens say they face a great deal or a fair amount of pressure to get good grades.

Who was measuredU.S. teens ages 13 to 17.

SourcePew Research Center · Published March 13, 2025; fielded Sept 18 to Oct 10, 2024

Read it carefullyThis combines “a great deal” and “a fair amount,” so it measures pressure broadly rather than acute pressure. Girls report it at 71%, boys at 65%.

35%

Act 2 · Part 03

of U.S. adults rate a college education as “very important,” down from 75% in 2010.

Who was measuredAll U.S. adults, n=1,094. Telephone random-digit-dial, ±4 points.

SourceGallup · Published Sept 11, 2025; fielded Aug 1 to 20, 2025

Read it carefullyParents of children under 18 came in at 38%, which Gallup describes as “similar to the national average.” The parent subgroup size is not published, so that gap is not a finding.

43%

of U.S. workers stay in their current role primarily because leaving would be too difficult or costly.

Who was measuredAdults working full or part time for an organization. Excludes the self-employed. n=22,368, ±1.0.

SourceGallup · Published March 23, 2026; fielded Oct 30 to Nov 14, 2025

Read it carefullyA separate item found 30% say they “feel stuck.” The two are different measures and should not be merged.

28.0%

of adults under 30 currently have or are being treated for depression, up from 13.0% in late 2017.

Who was measuredU.S. adults ages 18 to 29. n=5,017.

SourceGallup National Health and Well-Being Index · Published April 21, 2026; fielded Feb 18 to March 3, 2026

Read it carefullyThis is the current-depression item, not the lifetime “ever told by a doctor” item, which runs higher.

−27pts

the fall since 2023 in young Americans saying it is a good time to find a job locally: 70% in 2023, 55% in 2024, 43% in 2025.

Who was measuredU.S. respondents ages 15 to 34 in the Gallup World Poll. Full-sample n=1,000 adults 15+.

SourceGallup World Poll · Published May 11, 2026; fielded June 14 to July 16, 2025

Read it carefullyGallup compares this to a 33-point decline between 2007 and 2009. No subgroup margin of error is published and 15-to-34s are roughly a quarter of the sample, so treat the 43% as indicative.

63%

of adults 18 to 29 report doing okay or living comfortably financially, against 83% of adults 60 and over.

Who was measuredU.S. adults 18+. Analytic sample n=12,934.

SourceFederal Reserve, Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking · Published May 13, 2026; fielded Oct 17 to 28, 2025

Read it carefullyIpsos KnowledgePanel, probability-based. This is the combined “doing okay or living comfortably” measure, not the standalone “doing okay” response.

30%

Act 3 · Part 02

cumulative rise in consumer prices between July 2019 and July 2026.

Who was measuredU.S. city average, all urban consumers (CPI-U), all items. Index base 1982–84 = 100.

SourceU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index · July 2026 release, published August 12, 2026

Read it carefullyCalculated from the index levels stated in the BLS releases themselves: 256.571 in July 2019 against 333.918 in July 2026. Both are July, not-seasonally-adjusted, so this is a like-for-like comparison with no smoothing. Note this is a level, not a rate: the 12-month change as of July 2026 was 3.4%, well below the 2022 peak. Prices are not climbing quickly now; they did not come back down.

Half

Act 3 · Part 02

of American renter households spend more than 30% of their income on rent and utilities; 22.7 million households, or 49% of all renters.

Who was measuredU.S. renter households. Analysis of Census Bureau American Community Survey data.

SourceHarvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, State of the Nation’s Housing 2025 · Published June 2025, 2024 data

Read it carefullyA record share for the third consecutive year. 12.1 million households (27%) were severely burdened, paying more than half their income, in 2023. “Cost burden” is a long-standing federal threshold, not a judgement about any individual household’s finances.

Records-based and administrative studies

Built from employment records, transcripts or completed transactions rather than from opinion. Different strengths: large and concrete, but each one measures a narrow, specific thing.

$180K

the Fed’s baseline total cost of a four-year degree, rising to $272,000 if it takes five years and $364,000 at six. One extra year to finish “reduces the return by about a quarter”; two extra years, “by more than 40 percent.”

Who was measuredModelled costs and returns for U.S. bachelor’s graduates. Total cost combines direct cost with opportunity cost, the wages not earned while studying.

SourceAbel & Deitz, “When College Might Not Be Worth It,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York · April 16, 2025

Read it carefullyThis post argues the opposite of the point it is cited for. Its own conclusion is that “under all of these higher direct cost scenarios, the return remains above the threshold for a good investment,” and that taking five or six years “still generally pays off.” It is cited here only for the size of the number and the cost of delay, not as evidence that college fails. Two figures often attached to this post are not in it: the widely repeated 12.5% return belongs to the authors’ earlier post (this one says 12 to 13 percent), and no dollar figure for forgone wages appears anywhere in it; a $150,000 opportunity-cost line is arithmetic, not a Fed number, and should not be attributed to them.

2.6%

the estimated rate of return for a 25th-percentile college graduate. In the authors’ words: “for at least a quarter of college graduates, college does not appear to pay off.”

Who was measured25th percentile of U.S. bachelor’s graduates by earnings, 2024, under the baseline cost scenario.

SourceAbel & Deitz, Federal Reserve Bank of New York · April 16, 2025

Read it carefullyThe strongest single figure on this page for the argument, precisely because of who published it: the Fed defends the degree for the typical graduate in the same post. Two qualifiers are load-bearing: it is the baseline cost scenario and the 2024 cohort. Note also that the post uses both “at least a quarter” and “as many as a quarter” in different paragraphs; those do not mean the same thing, and the quotation above is the exact wording of the body sentence.

2000

Act 1 · Part 01

the approximate year demand for high-skill cognitive work stopped rising and reversed, after decades of growth, pushing graduates down the occupational ladder into jobs previously done by less-educated workers.

Who was measuredU.S. Census and Current Population Survey microdata, analysed by graduating cohort and occupation.

SourceBeaudry, Green & Sand, “The Great Reversal in the Demand for Skill and Cognitive Tasks” · NBER Working Paper 18901 (2013); Journal of Labor Economics (2016)

Read it carefullyThis is the sole citation behind one sentence on the problem page: that demand for graduates grew faster than graduates arrived through the 1980s and 1990s, and that this stopped around the turn of the century. It is a contested finding rather than a settled fact, and it should be read as one influential paper, not as consensus. Its evidence ends in the early 2010s, so it says nothing about the current AI period. Economists including David Autor continue to find a large and persistent college wage premium, which cuts against the strong version of this claim. An earlier draft of the problem page asserted “forty years” of rising demand with no source at all; that was wrong and was removed.

52%

Act 3 · Part 01

of graduates whose highest degree is a bachelor’s are underemployed one year after finishing. 45% are still underemployed a decade out.

Who was measuredAnalytic sample of 10.8 million terminal-bachelor’s records, graduating classes 2012 to 2021, employment measured in 2022.

SourceStrada Institute and Burning Glass Institute, “Talent Disrupted” · February 2024

Read it carefullyDrawn from the Lightcast Career Histories Database of 60 million-plus records. Runs higher than the NY Fed figure because it excludes advanced-degree holders, who are underemployed far less. A separate finding: 73% of graduates who start out underemployed are still underemployed ten years later.

19%

the shortfall in employment among workers ages 22 to 25 in the most AI-exposed occupations, relative to where it would stand had it kept pace with employment of similarly aged workers in less-exposed occupations. Experienced workers in the same occupations show no comparable gap.

Who was measuredHigh-frequency ADP payroll records covering millions of U.S. workers, through June 2026. Occupations classified by their exposure to AI; software development and customer service sit at the exposed end.

SourceBrynjolfsson, Chandar & Chen, “Canaries in the Coal Mine?”, Stanford Digital Economy Lab · August 2026 revision, data through June 2026

Read it carefullyThe authors call these early, descriptive indicators, not causal estimates; nothing here proves AI is the cause. Some of the divergence predates generative AI, the gap shrinks when education levels are accounted for, and the pattern is more pronounced in ADP’s sample than in national survey benchmarks. The leading rival explanation is interest rates rather than AI, since the hiring slump tracks the 2022 rate-hiking cycle; the researchers published their own follow-up on exactly that in February 2026. The lab maintains a live Canaries Dashboard and the figure has moved with each revision, so it should be pulled fresh, with its as-of date, before it is quoted anywhere.

30%

of undergraduates who had declared a major changed it at least once within three years.

Who was measuredStudents entering postsecondary education for the first time in 2011 to 2012 who enrolled in an associate’s or bachelor’s program and declared a major. Roughly 25,000 students.

SourceNational Center for Education Statistics, Data Point 2018-434 · December 2017

Read it carefullyThree-year window only, so not a full-career figure. Bachelor’s-only is about one third; associate’s is 28%. Roughly one in ten changed more than once.

$29,910

is the average published cost of one year at a public four-year college, in-state, all in. Out-of-state public is $49,080 and private nonprofit is $62,570. Over four years, roughly $120,000 to $250,000.

Who was measuredFull-time undergraduates, 2025–26 academic year. “All in” means tuition, fees, room, board, books, supplies and personal expenses, as reported by institutions.

SourceCollege Board, Trends in College Pricing and Student Aid 2025 · Published October 2025, for 2025–26

Read it carefullyThese are published, or sticker, prices. Most students receive grant aid: College Board estimates average net tuition and fees at about $2,300 for in-state public students and $16,910 at private nonprofits in 2025–26. Those net figures cover tuition and fees only, not living costs, so they are not comparable to the totals above. Aid also discounts only the money. It does not shorten the time. The book page uses $140,000 over four years, which sits between the in-state and out-of-state public figures.

40

Act 3 · Part 02

is the median age of a first-time U.S. homebuyer, an all-time high. The first-time buyer share fell to a record-low 21%.

Who was measuredPeople who actually closed on a primary residence between July 2024 and June 2025. n=6,103 responses.

SourceNational Association of Realtors, Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers · Published Nov 4, 2025

Read it carefullyMedian, not average. A mailed survey of recent buyers with a 3.5% response rate, so it describes completed purchases rather than the general population. Prior year was 38; 2023 was 35.

39%

of 15-year-olds have no clear career plans.

Who was measured15-year-olds across OECD member countries. Report scope covers roughly 690,000 students in 81 countries, from PISA 2022.

SourceOECD, “The State of Global Teenage Career Preparation” · May 20, 2025

Read it carefullyThis is an OECD-country average, not a United States figure. OECD reports the rate has grown by more than half since 2018; there is no ten-year baseline because the question was not asked that far back.

Opt-in panel surveys

Respondents volunteer rather than being randomly selected, so these cannot carry a margin of error and can skew. Useful for sentiment, weaker for prevalence.

39%

Act 1 · Part 03

of the skills a job requires are expected to change by 2030, with job disruption equal to 22% of jobs; 170 million roles created, 92 million displaced.

Who was measured1,000+ employers representing more than 14 million workers across 22 industry clusters and 55 economies. Global.

SourceWorld Economic Forum, Future of Jobs Report 2025 · January 2025

Read it carefullyThese are employer expectations about the future, not measurements of anything that has happened. Every figure here is what executives told the WEF they anticipate through 2030, and forecasts of this kind have a poor track record. The employers volunteered; there is no sampling frame and no margin of error. The same report projects a net gain of 78 million jobs, which is the optimistic half of the finding and belongs beside the disruption number. Related findings from the same survey: 63% of employers name the skills gap as the main barrier to transforming their business, and of every 100 workers, 59 are projected to need reskilling or upskilling by 2030, of whom 11 are unlikely to receive it. On its ranked list of the fifteen fastest-declining jobs, graphic designers place 11th at −20%, legal officials 13th at −18% and legal secretaries 14th at −17%; the other twelve are clerical, retail and manual roles. Note that reskilling applies to the whole workforce, not to graduates specifically, and the WEF frames it as an opportunity rather than a failure of education. What the report supports is that the composition of work is expected to shift quickly, not any specific number of jobs.

“”

Act 1 · Part 03

“Trends such as generative AI and rapid technological shifts are upending industries and labour markets, creating both unprecedented opportunities and profound risks.”

Who said itTill Leopold, Head of Work, Wages and Job Creation, World Economic Forum.

SourceWorld Economic Forum press release · January 2025

Read it carefullyThis is a characterization by an interested expert, not a finding. It is quoted on the problem page because it states a view held widely by people who study labour markets, not because it proves anything. The same release notes that graphic designers have newly joined the fastest-declining occupations alongside cashiers and administrative assistants, which is the concrete version of the same claim.

59%

Act 2 · Part 03

of parents say they would prefer their child attend college right after high school: 40% a four-year college, 19% a two-year or community college.

Who was measuredU.S. adults with a child under 18. n=2,017 adults including 554 parents.

SourceGallup and Lumina Foundation · Published Aug 7, 2025; fielded June 2 to 15, 2025

Read it carefullyGallup Panel, web. The 2026 wave reports 38% four-year and 19% two-year and describes the results as similar to 2025, so the two waves should not be read as a trend.

33%

of parents who do not want a four-year college for their child name cost as the main reason, unprompted. 17% cite return on investment.

Who was measuredParents who said they would not most prefer a four-year college. Subgroup size not published.

SourceGallup and Lumina Foundation · Published July 21, 2026

Read it carefullyAn open-ended question, so these are coded verbatim answers rather than options read aloud. A further 11% separately mention debt or loans.

71%

of student borrowers who have not completed a degree say they have delayed a major life milestone because of their loans.

Who was measuredU.S. adults 18 to 59 with a high school diploma who have not completed an associate’s or bachelor’s degree. n=14,032. Every degree-holder is excluded.

SourceGallup and Lumina Foundation · Published April 16, 2024; fielded Oct 9 to Nov 16, 2023

Read it carefullyDynata non-probability web panel; no margin of error is published. More than nine in ten of those who borrowed at least $60,000 report a delay, against 63% of those who borrowed under $10,000.

12%

of the rise in U.S. unemployment since mid-2023 came from recent graduates, who are about 5% of the labor force.

Who was measuredAges 22 to 27 with a bachelor’s or higher.

SourceOxford Economics · May 2025

Read it carefullyA widely repeated version of this claim puts the figure at 85%. That number refers to all new labor-market entrants, a far larger group, and should not be attributed to graduates.

51%

Act 3 · Part 02

of Gen Z degree-holders say their own degree was a waste of time or money, against 41% of millennials and 20% of baby boomers.

Who was measuredDegree-holding workers and job seekers, n=772. The Gen Z subgroup size is not published.

SourceIndeed and The Harris Poll · Fielded March 27–31, 2025

Read it carefullySame survey: 60% believe they could do their job just as well without the degree, and 52% say they would not have attended if a degree were not required for so many jobs.

Company-published research

Produced by businesses with a commercial interest in the subject. Methodology is often unpublished. Treated here as indicative, not as evidence.

244

Act 1 · Part 02

applications per job posting in 2025, up from 116 in 2022; a 111% rise in three years.

Who was measured6,000+ companies and 640M+ applications between 2022 and 2025. North America.

SourceGreenhouse, The Hire Standard benchmark report · March 2026

Read it carefullyThe full series runs 116 · 189 · 223 · 244. Vendor data drawn from Greenhouse’s own customer base, which skews toward white-collar tech, startup and mid-market employers, so it is not a cross-section of all U.S. jobs. It is a census of real transactions rather than a survey, so no margin of error applies, but no sampling frame does either. Much of the rise is one-click and AI auto-apply, so 244 is applications submitted, not 244 distinct qualified competitors. The baseline is 2022, not twenty years ago.

746

applications handled per recruiter per year in 2025, against 146 in 2022, while recruiters per organization fell from 10.4 to 4.6.

Who was measuredSame dataset: 6,000+ companies, 640M+ applications, 2022–2025.

SourceGreenhouse, The Hire Standard benchmark report · March 2026

Read it carefullyA 412% rise in volume per recruiter alongside a 56% fall in team size. Time to fill rose from 43.6 to 59.7 days over the same period. Same vendor-data caveats as above.

72%

Act 1 · Part 02

of business leaders say they have raised the qualifications and experience required for the same roles; 59% expect that to continue.

Who was measuredWorkday Recruiting customer data across 10,500+ organizations, plus a Hanover Research poll of 1,000 respondents fielded July 2024. Global, not U.S.-only.

SourceWorkday Global Workforce Report · September 10, 2024

Read it carefullyThe sentence quoted on the problem page reads in full: “While companies are hiring more, they’re also receiving a flood of applications, making it harder for employers to select the right candidate and for employees to stand out.” The same report found 173 million applications against 19 million job requisitions in the first half of 2024; applications growing roughly four times faster than openings. Vendor data with a commercial interest in the hiring market. Note the ratio in that figure works out to about nine applications per requisition, which is not comparable to the Greenhouse per-posting number above; the two count different things.

“”

Act 1 · Part 02

“While companies are hiring more, they’re also receiving a flood of applications, making it harder for employers to select the right candidate and for employees to stand out.”

Who said itWorkday Global Workforce Report, September 2024. The report is corporate-authored; no individual is named as the speaker, so the problem page attributes it to the report rather than to a person.

SourceWorkday Global Workforce Report · September 10, 2024

Read it carefullyVendor research with a commercial interest in the hiring market. It is quoted for what it describes, not as proof of a rate. The supporting figures behind it are in the 72% entry above.

48%

of graduates feel unprepared to apply for entry-level jobs in their field, while 89% of educators believe their students are ready.

Who was measuredOnline survey, June–July 2025: 865 hiring managers, 698 post-secondary instructors and 971 recent graduates, U.S.

SourceCengage Group 2025 Graduate Employability Report · September 9, 2025

Read it carefullyNon-probability online samples, so no margin of error applies. The same report found only 30% of 2025 graduates found work in their field. Cengage’s 2024 edition also found 73% of graduates said their education was worth the cost, which cuts the other way.

$33,100

Act 3 · Part 02

the gap between what students expect to earn ($101,500) and what recent graduates actually average ($68,400).

Who was measuredTwo different groups: students stating expectations, and recent graduates reporting actual pay.

SourceZipRecruiter, “The Graduate Divide” · April 23, 2025

Read it carefullyThese are two populations, not one cohort measured twice. ZipRecruiter’s 2026 edition switched from averages to medians, so there is no directly comparable update.

62%

Act 1 · Part 03

of young adults say they are not in the career they intended to pursue.

Who was measured2,000+ U.S. adults ages 18 to 30 at all education levels, including people who never attended college.

SourceTallo with Morning Consult, “The Resource Gap” · May 2025

Read it carefullyNot a measure of failing to get hired: 27% lacked required credentials, 25% took other work to pay bills, 18% found the field hard to enter, and 18% started families and shifted priorities.

~90%

Act 2 · Part 01

of college juniors and seniors say they chose their major with a specific job or career path in mind. In the same survey, 88% say their coursework is adequately preparing them for entry-level roles, while more than half of hiring managers surveyed a year earlier said recent graduates are unprepared.

Who was measuredMore than 2,000 U.S. college juniors and seniors. Non-probability survey by Seramount, whose Forage product sells the remedy.

SourceSeramount and Forage, From Coursework to Careers · May 6, 2025

Read it carefullyThe announcement says “nearly 90 percent” and never prints an exact figure; an earlier version of this entry gave it as 89%, which the published source does not support, and the problem page now says “nearly nine in ten.” The vendor has a commercial interest in a readiness gap existing. The two halves of this entry come from different surveys a year apart and are not a like-for-like comparison. Quoted on the problem page: Forage general manager Tom Brunskill; “Students feel ready because they’re doing well in class, but you can’t prepare for a marathon just by reading about running.”

“”

Act 2 · Part 01

“Students feel ready because they’re doing well in class, but you can’t prepare for a marathon just by reading about running.”

Who said itTom Brunskill, general manager of Forage.

SourceForage research announcement · September 24, 2024

Read it carefullyA vendor executive describing the market his company sells into, quoted as a characterization rather than a finding. The survey figures behind it are in the entry above; Forage publishes “nearly 90 percent,” never an exact number, which is why the problem page says “nearly nine in ten.”

33%

of registered voters say a four-year degree is worth the cost; 63% say it is not. In 2017 the same question split 49% worth against 47% not.

Who was measured1,000 U.S. registered voters, not all adults. Telephone plus text-to-web, ±3.1 points.

SourceNBC News national poll · Fielded Oct 24–28, 2025; published Dec 1, 2025

Read it carefullyThe sample is registered voters, not all adults. Note the wording too: the “not worth it” option names debt and missing job skills inside the answer, which pulls responses toward it.

1 in 4

college graduates wish they had pursued a different path (community college, an apprenticeship) or skipped college altogether. Separately, 46% say they could have got their current job without a degree.

Who was measured1,000 U.S. adults with a degree and 1,000 without.

SourceUSA TODAY Blueprint · October 2024

Read it carefullyAn earlier version of this entry put the figure at 33%; the report says nearly one in four, and it has been corrected. It cuts both ways: about three-quarters of graduate-degree holders, and 59% of associate or bachelor’s holders, say they do not regret attending.

What we took down

Claims that did not survive checking.

These were on this site or in the drafts behind it. Each was checked against the originating source and removed. They are listed here because a page that only shows what survived is not a source page.

“70% say college did not prepare them for the job market.”

Cengage Group

The real 70% in that report is graduates saying basic AI training should be added to courses. It is not a verdict on preparation, and the same report found 73% of graduates said their education was worth the cost.

“Up to 75% of students change majors at least once.”

Widely circulated, often miscredited to NCES

Traces back to an uncited assertion in a 2016 advisory paper whose own analysis never measured switching rates. NCES, the body it is usually attributed to, publishes 30%.

“85% of the rise in unemployment is recent graduates.”

Oxford Economics

The 85% describes all new labor-market entrants. Oxford’s figure for recent graduates specifically is 12%.

“43% of first-time buyers cite student loans as the top obstacle to a down payment.”

Attributed to the National Association of Realtors

This appears in no NAR publication. NAR’s own figure for the obstacle question is 36%, and high rent outranks student loans. The 43% appears to be a garbled version of a different statistic about how many Younger Millennials carry student debt.

“7 in 10 teens say anxiety and depression are a major problem.”

Pew Research Center

Real, but fielded in fall 2018 and stated without its qualifier. Pew asked whether it was a major problem among people their age in the community where they live, so it measures what teens see around them rather than what they report about themselves. Pew’s current wave asks a differently worded question and finds 30%.

“Four in ten teenagers are unclear about their career, double the rate of a decade ago.”

OECD

The 39% is real but it is an OECD-country average for 15-year-olds, not a United States figure. The decade comparison does not exist; the underlying question was not asked that far back.

What cuts the other way

The honest counter-evidence.

The argument on this site is not that college is worthless. It is that college should not be the unexamined default. Here is what a fair skeptic would raise, and should.

Degree requirements in postings are rising again.

19.3% of U.S. job postings required a bachelor’s in November 2025, up from 16.6% two years earlier; and that holds after controlling for which jobs exist, so it is not simply a shift in the mix. It sits against the skills-first narrative, and it is reported here for that reason. Indeed’s own reading is that the degree may now be serving as a shortlisting filter in a crowded market rather than as a measure of skill.

Indeed Hiring Lab, January 2026

The degree still pays off on average.

The New York Fed puts the lifetime return on a degree near 12.5%. And on the comparison its own economists prefer, recent graduates at 5.7% unemployment still do better than their same-age peers without degrees at roughly 7.2%.

Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2026

My own story is a sample of one.

Our daughter left college after a semester, spent seven months going nowhere, and only turned it around after we told her she had to move out. It is the case I know best and it proves nothing on its own. The figures above came first. We read them when she was a child and parented accordingly.

Read it, including the parts that do not flatter us

Confidence in higher education ticked up.

For the first time in a decade, the share expressing a great deal or quite a lot of confidence rose from 36% to 42%. Still well below 57% in 2015, but the direction matters and it is reported here for that reason.

Gallup and Lumina Foundation, 2025

Most graduates do not regret attending.

Around 59% of degree holders say their education helped prepare them for a well-paying job. Regret about a specific major sits near 20%, far below the headline “waste of money” numbers.

Pew Research Center, 2024; USA Today, 2024

The regret surveys are contested.

The Gen Z subsamples inside them are small and mostly unpublished. The distance between low major-specific regret near 20% and high “waste” sentiment at 36% to 51% suggests the anger is about cost and debt at least as much as about the education.

Methodological caveat

Underemployment is not new, and not permanent.

Roughly a third of graduates of any age have worked in jobs not requiring a degree across the past three decades, in good economies and bad. Many move out of it. The NY Fed series has run between 38% and 48% since 2008.

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

A note on sourcing

Where a statistic circulates through secondary outlets, it is attributed here to the organization that produced it rather than to the news story that amplified it. Several of the claims in the section above were removed precisely because that trail led somewhere different from where the popular version said it did.

Several figures update on a fixed schedule. The New York Fed labor series publishes in February, May, August and November. The Federal Reserve household survey publishes each May. The National Association of Realtors profile publishes each November. When those land, the numbers here should be rechecked rather than assumed.

Pathbreaker Parenting source file. Figures verified against originating sources in August 2026.
Found an error? seth@pathbreakerparenting.com